slums vs moca, Comparison of the Saint Louis University Mental

Results. Spearman correlation coefficient between scores of the scales were 0.747 (SLUMS vs CMMSE, P < .001), 0.839 (SLUMS vs MoCA-B, P < .001), and 0.773 (CMMSE vs MoCA-B, P < .001). For detection of dementia, κ values were 0.462 (SLUMS vs CMMSE, P < .000) and 0.484 (mSLUMS vs CMMSE, P < .000). For mild cognitive impairment, κ values were 0.123 (SLUMS vs CMMSE plus MoCA

slums vs moca, Cognitive tests for dementia: MMSE, Mini

An alternative test, the MoCA, was found to perform better (in 9 studies) with: a sensitivity of 89%; and a specificity of 75%; No data was provided on the other tests presumably because there weren’t enough studies. The freely available ACE-R and Mini-Cog instruments may be viable alternatives to the MMSE for detecting dementia.

For all cognitive impairment, κ values were 0.562 (SLUMS vs MoCA-B, P < .000) and 0.650 (SLUMS vs MoCA-B, P < .000). CONCLUSION: Findings from our study indicate that the scores of SLUMS are fairly consistent with MoCA-B and CMMSE in Chinese elderly.

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), often used in clinical practice as a quick screen for Alzheimer disease (AD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), get high marks for diagnostic accuracy in a study of community-dwelling older adults, according to a study done by researchers from the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.

Slums vs moca keyword after analyzing the system lists the list of keywords related and the list of websites with related content, in addition you can see which keywords most interested customers on

The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are the most commonly used scales to test cognitive impairment in Lewy body disease (LBD), but there is no consensus on which is best suited to assess cognition in clinical practice and most sensitive to cognitive decline. Retrospective cohort study of 265 LBD patients [Parkinson’s disease

PDF-fil

• MoCA sensitive to cognitive spectrum but does not have a Story Recall or complex reasoning item • The SLUMS sensitive to cognitive spectrum but Story Recall does not measure delayed or non-cued recall and there is no set-shifting item • BCAT and BCAT-Short Form are sensitive to MCI but have a cost associated with training and licensure

The SLUMS examination is brief test designed to measure a patient’s abilities in orientation, executive function, memory, and attention. Evaluation of the exam can be used to determine if a full

The Saint Louis University Mental Status exam is an assessment tool for mild cognitive impairment and dementia and was developed in partnership with the Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center at the St. Louis Veterans Administration Medical Center.

slums vs moca, (PDF) Comparison between mini mental state

Mean differences of MoCA-Ina was assessed using Mann-Whitney test resulting no significant differences between left vs right hemisphere groups (18.94 + 3.26 vs 19.82 + 3.13; p= 0.320).

Slums vs moca keyword after analyzing the system lists the list of keywords related and the list of websites with related content, in addition you can see which keywords most interested customers on

The Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) examination is a popular screening scale for cognitive impairment in North America but has not been studied in Chinese populations. The aim of this study is to compare consistency of the SLUMS with the Chinese version of Mini-Mental Status Examination (CMMSE) and the Beijing version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-B) in Chinese elderly

INTRODUCTION: The Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) examination is a popular screening scale for cognitive impairment in North America but has not been studied in Chinese populations. The aim of this study is to compare consistency of the SLUMS with the Chinese version of Mini-Mental Status Examination (CMMSE) and the Beijing version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-B) in

PDF-fil

needed. Some providers repeat patient assessment with an alternate tool (e.g., SLUMS, or MoCA) to confirm initial findings before referral or initiation of full dementia evaluation. Cordell CB, Borson S, Boustani M, Chodosh J, Reuben D, Verghese J, et al. Alzheimer’s Association

MoCA vs MMSE-sevens (AUC difference 12%; p < 0.05) MoCA screening cutoff for PD-D = 21/30 (SN 81%, SP 95%, AUC 97%; 95% CI 92-99%, NPV = 95%) MoCA vs MMSE-world (AUC difference 10%, p < 0.05) MoCA, MMSE, and SCOPA-COG, All 3 accurately discriminated for PD-D without statistical distinction on ROC values between measures

The SLUMS examination is a popular and quick cognitive assessment, and my current favorite free assessment (especially since the MoCA cognitive assessment is no longer free). The SLUMS incorporates a clock drawing task, animal naming, figure differentiation and size differentiation, assessing orientation, memory, attention, and executive function.

Objective: The aims of this study were to investigate which scale is best suited to assess cognition and more sensitive to cognitive decline over time in LBD. Background: The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are the most commonly used scales to test cognitive impairment in Lewy body disease (LBD), but []